Computer Science – Performance
Scientific paper
Jun 1996
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996spie.2745....2k&link_type=abstract
Proc. SPIE Vol. 2745, p. 2-11, Infrared Readout Electronics III, Eric R. Fossum; Ed.
Computer Science
Performance
2
Scientific paper
We compare the capacitive transimpedance amplifier (CTIA) to two other IR detector interface circuits using data compiled from hybrid FPAs in various formats from 8 X 8 to 1024 X 1024. The CTIA generally offers the best overall performance characteristics including read noise as low as 27 e- at signal bandwidths compatible with TV-type frame rates, low power dissipation (in some cases significantly less than 200 nW per pixel), and sufficiently low MOSFET self-emission for background-limited sensitivity at scene backgrounds significantly less than 10(superscript 9) photons/cm(superscript 2)- s. The alternative schemes should, however, be considered especially when very high transimpedance is needed at moderate bandwidths or when radiometric linearity is not required.
No associations
LandOfFree
Low-noise capacitive transimpedance amplifier performance versus alternative IR detector interface schemes in submicron CMOS does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Low-noise capacitive transimpedance amplifier performance versus alternative IR detector interface schemes in submicron CMOS, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Low-noise capacitive transimpedance amplifier performance versus alternative IR detector interface schemes in submicron CMOS will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1304487