Low-Metallicity Lead Stars: Comparison between Theory and Observations

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4

Population Ii Stars, Abundances, Chemical Composition

Scientific paper

We compare AGB theoretical models with spectroscopic abundances of a sample of very metal-poor, C-rich, s-rich and lead-rich stars observed at high-resolution spectroscopy. Fits are obtained for AGB models with different 13C-pocket efficiencies and initial masses. The two intrinsic indicators, [hs/ls] and [Pb/hs] versus [Fe/H], are analyzed. An extended analysis of all the observed elements is made, outlining apparent discrepancies for a few elements. The analysis of C and N abundances strengthen the need of a strong cool bottom process occurring during the AGB. A significant number of these stars are both s-enriched and r-enriched. For them, the envelope abundances are predicted by mass transfer from the more massive AGB companion in a binary system from a parental cloud already enriched in r-elements.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Low-Metallicity Lead Stars: Comparison between Theory and Observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Low-Metallicity Lead Stars: Comparison between Theory and Observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Low-Metallicity Lead Stars: Comparison between Theory and Observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1136793

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.