Local vs. Joint Measurements for the Entanglement of Assistance

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

20 pages, 6 figures, Minor changes, added reference to paper by O. Cohen

Scientific paper

We consider a variant of the entanglement of assistance, as independently introduced by D.P. DiVincenzo {\em et al.} ({\tt quant-ph/9803033}) and O. Cohen (Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 2493 (1998)). Instead of considering three-party states in which one of the parties, the assistant, performs a measurement such that the remaining two parties are left with on average as much entanglement as possible, we consider four-party states where two parties play the role of assistants. We answer several questions that arise naturally in this scenario, such as (i) how much more entanglement can be produced when the assistants are allowed to perform joint measurements, (ii) for what type of states are local measurements sufficient, (iii) is it necessary for the second assistant to know the measurement outcome of the first, and (iv) are projective measurements sufficient or are more general POVMs needed?

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Local vs. Joint Measurements for the Entanglement of Assistance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Local vs. Joint Measurements for the Entanglement of Assistance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Local vs. Joint Measurements for the Entanglement of Assistance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-361021

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.