Lindblad's epicycles - valid method or bad science?

Physics – General Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

A high resolution version of this paper is available from http://papers.rqgravity.net/Epicycles.pdf

Scientific paper

The study of Galactic orbits in the last eighty years has been dominated by statistical assumptions made because of the lack of empirical evidence available in the early 20th century. Using evidence from Hipparcos and recent radial velocity surveys, Francis and Anderson recently showed that spiral structure is primarily a consequence of gravitational alignments of stellar orbits. I review the mechanism which creates spiral structure, consider the validity of widely held assumptions in galactic dynamics and the implications to notions such as the asymmetric drift and disc heating. I identify a number of fundamental mathematical and physical errors in Lindblad's epicycle theory and in density wave theory. Students should be made aware that these ideas can no longer be considered as science, and authors of textbooks should consider whether they merit anything more than a historical note.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Lindblad's epicycles - valid method or bad science? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Lindblad's epicycles - valid method or bad science?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Lindblad's epicycles - valid method or bad science? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-659698

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.