Aug 1920
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1920natur.105..742t&link_type=abstract
Nature, Volume 105, Issue 2650, pp. 742 (1920).
Physics
Scientific paper
I REGRET that I inadvertently wrote ``sub-polar'' for ``sub-solar'' in my remarks on Prof. G. C. Comstock's book on Sumner lines, but this lapse makes no difference really to the statement that the proper description should be zenith point, and not sub-solar point (see p. vi of preface and pp. 2, 3, , etc.). Sub-solar refers to the sun only, and does not necessarily include sub-stellar or sub-lunar, but zenith point is common to all.
No associations
LandOfFree
[Letters to Editor] does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with [Letters to Editor], we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and [Letters to Editor] will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-784955