Physics – Physics Education
Scientific paper
Sep 2001
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001phyed..36..433.&link_type=abstract
Physics Education, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp. 433 (2001).
Physics
Physics Education
Scientific paper
The Editor welcomes letters, by e-mail to ped@iop.org or by post to Dirac House, Temple Back, Bristol BS1 6BE, UK. Contents: M-set as metaphor The abuse of algebra
M-set as metaphor
'To see a World in a Grain of Sand And a Heaven in a Wild Flower Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand And Eternity in an hour'
William Blake's implied relativity of spatial and temporal scales is intriguing and, given the durability of this worlds-within-worlds concept (he wrote in 1803) in art, literature and science, the blurring of distinctions between the very large and the very small must strike some kind of harmonious chord in the human mind.
Could this concept apply to the physical world? To be honest, we cannot be absolutely sure. Most cosmological thinking still retains the usual notions of a finite universe and an absolute size scale extending from smallest to largest objects. In the boundless realm of mathematics, however, the story is quite different.
The M-set was discovered by the French mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot in 1980, created by just a few simple lines of computer code that are repeated recursively. As in Blake's poem, this 'world' has no bottom we have an almost palpable archetype for the concept of infinity. I would use the word 'tangible', but one of the defining features of the M-set is that nowhere in the labyrinth can one find a surface smooth enough for a tangent. Upon magnification even surfaces that appeared to be smooth explode with quills and scrolls and lightning bolts and spiral staircases.
And there is something more, something truly sublime. Observe a small patch with unlimited magnifying power and, as you observe the M-set on ever-smaller scales, down through literally endless layers of ornate structure, you occasionally come upon a rapidly expanding cortex of dazzling colour with a small black structure at its centre. The black spot appears to be the M-set itself! There is no end to the hierarchy, no bottom-most level, just endless recursive worlds within worlds within worlds. Scale is no longer fixed and absolute, but is purely relative. These beautiful symmetries convey an immediate aesthetic pleasure and also compel one to think about these strange concepts of self-similarity, infinity and relativity of scale.
Our present science tends to favour reductionism. We surmise that the physics of our world has a most fundamental level and all phenomena are built up from these quarks or strings. Mathe-matics need not be so limited: here the mind is set free to dream of universes with the most exquisite symmetries and infinities. I urge you to explore the M-set. The epiphanies you experience will be worth the effort.
Robert L Oldershaw Physics Department, Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA rlolders@unix.amherst.edu
Video copies of The Colors of Infinity are available from Humanities, Inc. Princeton, New Jersey, priced 30. There are also several websites such as www.softlab.ntua.gr/mandel/mandel.html or tqd.advanced.org/3288.
The abuse of algebra
What a pleasure it is to read the work of students whose reasoning is easy to follow, who observe the rules of grammar in all their writing, and who remember that an algebraic equation is and must be a sentence in their native language, albeit written in a universal shorthand.
About thirty years ago the ASE encouraged us all to use 'Quantity Algebra' consistently rather than to muddle on with inconsistent (and therefore incorrect) hybrids of 'Number' and 'Quantity' Algebra.
Number Algebra is tedious if used correctly in physics. But Quantity Algebra seems to petrify Maths departments, whose incoherent practices undermine the efforts of Physics teachers to persuade their pupils to reason both logically and clearly.
When I read a pupil's work, the final answer (or conclusion) interests me far less than the reasoning that leads to that conclusion. I want to be able to check the work as I read it, and it helps greatly if units are included when values are substituted for symbols. Textbooks which set out their worked examples in Quantity Algebra are especially appreciated, not only for illustrating the 'good practice' we want to encourage, but, of course, in helping the student keep sight of the physics throughout. Physics texts which do not use Quantity Algebra in their worked examples invariably demonstrate faulty logic ... besides hiding the physics.
Here is a very simple example:
Good practice: Force = 70 kg × 10 N/kg = 700 N
Bad practice: Force = 70 × 10 = 700 (or Force = 700 N)
The final 'slide-rule' manipulation is of numbers, of course; but we should keep sight of the route to those numbers.
Years ago the Head of Maths at a large comprehensive school described how he persuaded all departments to convert to Quantity Algebra. But he ended with an admission: that such an initiative must come from the Head of Maths. That enlightened man understood the problem: his fellow mathematicians.
Tim Watson Worcester
No affiliations
No associations
LandOfFree
Letters does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Letters, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Letters will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1162394