Physics
Scientific paper
Jul 1981
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1981pepi...26...56c&link_type=abstract
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Volume 26, Issue 1-2, p. 56-62.
Physics
113
Scientific paper
The disparity in response to high alternating field (AF) demagnetization for samples containing fine magnetic carriers is apparently related to the degree of interactions between those carriers. The presence of interaction fields between single domain (SD) grains can be tested by plotting isothermal remanence (IRM) acquisition vs. saturation remanence (SIRM) demagnetization. For the case of non-interacting SD grains, the two curves will be symmetrical. For the interacting SD case, the acquisition curve will be steepest at higher fields, and the demagnetization curve steepest at lower fields, resulting in non-symmetry. The point of intersection of the two curves approximates the remanent coercive force (HRC) field for all cases. Minor hysteresis loops and anhysteretic remanence (ARM) acquisition curves are also strongly influenced by interaction fields. Because of the difficulty in dispersing strongly magnetic grains, fine grained synthetic samples made with highly magnetic materials will not display equivalent AF stability to natural samples with fine, dispersed grains.
No associations
LandOfFree
Interacting vs. non-interacting single domain behavior in natural and synthetic samples does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Interacting vs. non-interacting single domain behavior in natural and synthetic samples, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interacting vs. non-interacting single domain behavior in natural and synthetic samples will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1690370