Physics
Scientific paper
Feb 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004georl..3103501m&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 31, Issue 3, CiteID L03501
Physics
13
Hydrology: Snow And Ice (1827), Hydrology: Runoff And Streamflow, Hydrology: Water/Energy Interactions
Scientific paper
Basin-average albedo estimated from remotely-sensed Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectroradiometer (AVIRIS) data specific to the catchment typically differed by 20% from albedo estimated using a common snow-age-based empirical relation. In some parts of the basin, differences were as large as 0.31. Using the AVIRIS albedo estimates in a distributed snowmelt model that explicitly includes net solar radiation resulted in a much more accurate estimate of the timing and magnitude of snowmelt as compared to the same model with the empirical albedo (R2 of 0.73 versus 0.59 and magnitude error of 2% versus 36%). Model improvement was most significant in areas and at times where incident solar radiation was relatively high and temperatures low.
Bales Roger C.
Dozier Jeff
Molotch Noah P.
Painter Thomas H.
No associations
LandOfFree
Incorporating remotely-sensed snow albedo into a spatially-distributed snowmelt model does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Incorporating remotely-sensed snow albedo into a spatially-distributed snowmelt model, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Incorporating remotely-sensed snow albedo into a spatially-distributed snowmelt model will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1019326