Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2005
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2005georl..3223s10u&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 32, Issue 23, CiteID L23S10
Physics
1
Geodesy And Gravity: Ocean Monitoring With Geodetic Techniques (1225, 1641, 3010, 4532, 4556, 4560, 6959), Oceanography: Physical: Sea Level: Variations And Mean (1222, 1225, 1641), Oceanography: Physical: Instruments And Techniques
Scientific paper
ICESat calculations of sea level and mesoscale variability are demonstrated and compared to calculations from TOPEX altimetry. In particular, we examine the accuracy of the ICESat Laser 2a Release 21 GLA15 ocean elevations. A global ICESat ocean elevation bias of -10.0 +/- 1.0 cm (low) was found with respect to TOPEX, obtained with a reference mean sea surface (MSS). Dual-satellite (ICESat - TOPEX) crossovers independently verify this bias, having a mean of -11.7 +/- 1.8 cm. The origin of this bias is unknown, although it may be related to sea state. Release 21 improvements have mitigated ICESat's thermally-induced day/night laser pointing variations to 1 to 2 cm in elevation. The average daily single-satellite internal crossover RMS is 12 cm for ICESat, 7 cm for TOPEX. ICESat laser altimetry is able to match TOPEX detection of major sea level anomaly and mesoscale variability features on a global scale.
Schutz Bob E.
Urban Timothy J.
No associations
LandOfFree
ICESat sea level comparisons does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with ICESat sea level comparisons, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and ICESat sea level comparisons will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1432727