Homoclinic splitting, II. A possible counterexample to a claim by Rudnev and Wiggins on Physica D

Nonlinear Sciences – Chaotic Dynamics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

2 pages, plain TeX

Scientific paper

10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00071-8

Results in the mentioned paper do not seem valid.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Homoclinic splitting, II. A possible counterexample to a claim by Rudnev and Wiggins on Physica D does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Homoclinic splitting, II. A possible counterexample to a claim by Rudnev and Wiggins on Physica D, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Homoclinic splitting, II. A possible counterexample to a claim by Rudnev and Wiggins on Physica D will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-433899

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.