Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
1999-08-02
Phys.Rev. D61 (2000) 034019; Erratum-ibid. D63 (2001) 059901
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
20 pages, 10 figures. Predictions of Table 4 corrected and acknowledgements added
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevD.61.034019
Using the largest data set available, we determine the best values that the data at t=0 (total cross sections and real parts of the hadronic amplitudes) give for the intercepts and couplings of the soft pomeron and of the rho/omega and a/f trajectories. We show that these data cannot discriminate between a simple-pole fit and asymptotic log square s and log s fits, and hence are not sufficient to reveal the ultimate nature of the pomeron. However, we evaluate the existing evidence (factorization, universality, quark counting) favouring the simple-pole hypothesis. We also examine the range of validity in energy of the fits, and show that one cannot rely on such fits in the region sqrt(s)<9 GeV. We also establish bounds on the odderon and the hard pomeron.
Cudell Jean-Rene
Ezhela V. V.
Kang Kyungsik
Lugovsky S.
Tkachenko N.
No associations
LandOfFree
High-Energy Forward Scattering and the Pomeron: Simple Pole versus Unitarized Models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with High-Energy Forward Scattering and the Pomeron: Simple Pole versus Unitarized Models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and High-Energy Forward Scattering and the Pomeron: Simple Pole versus Unitarized Models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-37598