High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions

Details High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions

2007-09-30

arxiv.org/abs/0710.0158v2

Phys.Rev.D76:124038,2007

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Updated to agree with published version (various minor clarifications; added description of AH finder in Sec IIB; added discus

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.76.124038

Numerical simulations of 15 orbits of an equal-mass binary black hole system are presented. Gravitational waveforms from these simulations, covering more than 30 cycles and ending about 1.5 cycles before merger, are compared with those from quasi-circular zero-spin post-Newtonian (PN) formulae. The cumulative phase uncertainty of these comparisons is about 0.05 radians, dominated by effects arising from the small residual spins of the black holes and the small residual orbital eccentricity in the simulations. Matching numerical results to PN waveforms early in the run yields excellent agreement (within 0.05 radians) over the first $\sim 15$ cycles, thus validating the numerical simulation and establishing a regime where PN theory is accurate. In the last 15 cycles to merger, however, {\em generic} time-domain Taylor approximants build up phase differences of several radians. But, apparently by coincidence, one specific post-Newtonian approximant, TaylorT4 at 3.5PN order, agrees much better with the numerical simulations, with accumulated phase differences of less than 0.05 radians over the 30-cycle waveform. Gravitational-wave amplitude comparisons are also done between numerical simulations and post-Newtonian, and the agreement depends on the post-Newtonian order of the amplitude expansion: the amplitude difference is about 6--7% for zeroth order and becomes smaller for increasing order. A newly derived 3.0PN amplitude correction improves agreement significantly ($<1%$ amplitude difference throughout most of the run, increasing to 4% near merger) over the previously known 2.5PN amplitude terms.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-721845