Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

10 pages

Scientific paper

This paper is an answer to the first part of Adrian Kent's One World versus Many : the Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation [arXiv:0905.0624]. We take issue with Kent's arguments against many-world interpretations of quantum mechanics. We argue that his reasons for preferring single-world interpretations are logically flawed and that his proposed singleworld alternative to probability theory suffers from conceptual problems. We use a few thought-experiments which show that the problems he raises for probabilities in multiverses also apply in a single universe.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-728016

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.