Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2011-11-10
Physics
Quantum Physics
10 pages
Scientific paper
This paper is an answer to the first part of Adrian Kent's One World versus Many : the Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation [arXiv:0905.0624]. We take issue with Kent's arguments against many-world interpretations of quantum mechanics. We argue that his reasons for preferring single-world interpretations are logically flawed and that his proposed singleworld alternative to probability theory suffers from conceptual problems. We use a few thought-experiments which show that the problems he raises for probabilities in multiverses also apply in a single universe.
Duhamel Vincent
Raymond-Robichaud Paul
No associations
LandOfFree
Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-728016