Physics
Scientific paper
Jul 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004georl..3113616w&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 31, Issue 13, CiteID L13616
Physics
19
Geodesy And Gravity: Control Surveys, Geodesy And Gravity: Geopotential Theory And Determination, Geodesy And Gravity: Space Geodetic Surveys, Geodesy And Gravity: Terrestrial Reference Systems, Geodesy And Gravity: Instruments And Techniques
Scientific paper
We have used the new gravity field model GGM01C derived from GRACE data to reanalyze DORIS data from 1993.0 to 2003.2 using the Gipsy/Oasis software and a free-network approach. We have estimated the position and velocity of each DORIS station in ITRF2000. In order to test the accuracy of these results, we have compared them to the positions and velocities of 43 collocated GPS stations using local ties and covariance information. DORIS results computed using the GGM01C gravity field instead of the EGM96 gravity field show a significantly improved external agreement with GPS. Position agreement of 12-26 mm was reduced to 10-13 mm and velocity agreement of 3.3-3.7 mm/yr was reduced to 2.4-3.3 mm/yr. This can be interpreted as an external test of the accuracy of the new GGM01C gravity field.
Heflin Michael Brent
Willis Pascal
No associations
LandOfFree
External validation of the GRACE GGM01C gravity field using GPS and DORIS positioning results does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with External validation of the GRACE GGM01C gravity field using GPS and DORIS positioning results, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and External validation of the GRACE GGM01C gravity field using GPS and DORIS positioning results will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1010273