Physics – General Physics
Scientific paper
2005-03-24
The European Physical Journal D vol. 31 p.113-120 (2004)
Physics
General Physics
Revtex-file vithout figures. To get the journal-pdf-file with figures, please, contact with achubykalo@yahoo.com.mx
Scientific paper
10.1140/epjd/e2004-00135-x
It is shown that the generally accepted definition of the Poynting vector and the energy flux vector defined by means of the energy density of the electromagnetic field (Umov vector) lead to the prediction of the different results touching electromagnetic energy flux. The experiment shows that within the framework of the mentioned generally accepted definitions the Poynting vector adequately describes the electromagnetic energy flux unlike the Umov vector. Therefore one can conclude that a generally accepted definitions of the electromagnetic energy density and the Poynting vector, in general, are not always compatible.
Chubykalo Andrew
Espinoza Augusto
Tzonchev Rumen
No associations
LandOfFree
Experimental test of the compatibility of the definitions of the electromagnetic energy density and the Poynting vector does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Experimental test of the compatibility of the definitions of the electromagnetic energy density and the Poynting vector, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Experimental test of the compatibility of the definitions of the electromagnetic energy density and the Poynting vector will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-29690