Physics
Scientific paper
Apr 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011georl..3808611q&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 38, Issue 8, CiteID L08611
Physics
2
Oceanography: Physical: General Circulation (1218, 1222), Geodesy And Gravity: Ocean Monitoring With Geodetic Techniques (1225, 1641, 3010, 4532, 4556, 4560, 6959)
Scientific paper
Knowledge of variability in ocean bottom pressure (pb) at periods < 60 days is essential for minimizing aliasing in satellite gravity missions. We assess how well we know such rapid, non-tidal pb signals by analyzing in-situ bottom pressure recorder (BPR) data and available global estimates from two very different modeling approaches. Estimated pb variance is generally lower than that measured by the BPRs, implying the presence of correlated model errors. Deriving uncertainties from differencing the model estimates can thus severely underestimate the aliasing errors. Removing estimated series from BPR data tends to reduce the variance by up to ˜5 cm2 but residual variance is still ˜5-20 cm2 and not negligible relative to expected variance in climate pb signals. The residual pb variability can be correlated over hundreds of kilometers. Results indicate the need to improve estimates of rapid pb variability in order to minimize aliasing noise in current and future satellite-based pb observations.
Ponte Rui M.
Quinn Katherine J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Estimating high frequency ocean bottom pressure variability does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Estimating high frequency ocean bottom pressure variability, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Estimating high frequency ocean bottom pressure variability will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-766598