Ejecta deposit thickness, heat flow, and a critical ambiguity on the Moon

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8

Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets: Heat Flow, Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets: Origin And Evolution, Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects: Moon (1221)

Scientific paper

The Apollo lunar heat flow measurements gave values of 21 and 16 mW m-2 which, after extrapolation based on thorium abundances, yields a global estimate of 18 mW m-2. A refinement of the assumptions of the subsurface structure and the resulting focusing of heat flux later led to a revision of the global value to 12 mW m-2. We think that to date none of the models linking the Apollo heat flow measurements has sufficiently highlighted a critical source of ambiguity. Little attention has been paid to the full magnitude of the uncertainty in these measurements caused by near-surface Thorium abundances and the local thickness of the ejecta blanket generated by the Imbrium impact. In a simple study we show that lunar heat flow is contingent upon the thickness of the ejecta blanket of the hypothetical impact. A model with an exponential decrease of Th concentration with depth can explain the difference in surface heat flow between the Apollo 15 and the Apollo 17 measurements. A constant Thorium concentration within the ejecta layer amplifies this effect. The variation in local surface Th abundance, if taken as representative of the subsurface Th distribution within the ejecta blanket, amplifies the uncertainty. We conclude that further measurements are essential for making well-founded statements about the subsurface abundance of radioactive elements, mantle heat flux and the thermal state of the Moon.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Ejecta deposit thickness, heat flow, and a critical ambiguity on the Moon does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Ejecta deposit thickness, heat flow, and a critical ambiguity on the Moon, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ejecta deposit thickness, heat flow, and a critical ambiguity on the Moon will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-906125

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.