Dynamics of mantle flow and melting at a ridge-centered hotspot: Iceland and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Details Dynamics of mantle flow and melting at a ridge-centered hotspot: Iceland and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge Dynamics of mantle flow and melting at a ridge-centered hotspot: Iceland and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Oct 1996

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996e%26psl.144...53i&link_type=abstract

Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 144, Issue 1-2, p. 53-74.

Physics

66

Scientific paper

The dynamics of mantle flow and melting of a ridge-centered plume were investigated with three-dimensional variable-viscosity numerical models, focusing on three buoyancy sources: temperature, melt depletion, and melt retention. The width, W, to which a plume spreads along a ridge axis, depends on plume volume flux, Q, full spreading rate, U, buoyancy number, B, and ambient/plume viscosity contrast γ. When all melting effects are considered, our numerical results are best parameterized by W = 2.37(Q/U)1/(2)(Bγ)0.04. Thermal buoyancy is first-order in controlling along-axis plume spreading while latent heat loss due to melting, and depletion and retention buoyancy forces contribute second-order effects. We propose two end-member models for the Iceland plume beneath the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR). The first has a broad plume source with temperature anomaly ΔTp of 75°C, radius, a, of 300 km, and Q of 1.2 × 107 km3/my. The second is of a narrower and hotter plume source with ΔTp of 170°C, a radius of 60 km, and Q of 2.1 × 106 km3/my. The broad plume source predicts successfully the observed seismic crustal thickness, topographic, and gravity anomalies along the MAR, but predicts an along-axis geochemical plume width substantially broader than that suggested by the observed87Sr/(86Sr) anomaly. The narrow plume source model predicts successfully the total excess crustal production rate along the MAR (2.5 × 105 km3/my) and a geochemical width consistent with that of the87Sr/(86Sr) anomaly, but it requires substantial along-axis melt transport to explain the observed along-axis variations in crustal thickness, bathymetry, and gravity. Calculations suggest that lateral plume dispersion may be radially symmetric rather than channelled along the ridge axis and that the topographic swell, which is elongated along the Reykjanes Ridge, may be due to rapid off-axis subsidence associated with lithospheric cooling superimposed on a broader hotspot swell. The two plume source models predict seismic P-wave velocity reductions of 0.5-2% in the center of the plume, producing travel time delays of 0.2-1.2 s. Predicted P-wave delay times for the narrow plume source model are more consistent with recent seismic observations beneath Iceland, suggesting that this model may be more representative of the Iceland plume.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Dynamics of mantle flow and melting at a ridge-centered hotspot: Iceland and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Dynamics of mantle flow and melting at a ridge-centered hotspot: Iceland and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dynamics of mantle flow and melting at a ridge-centered hotspot: Iceland and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1213059