Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2010-11-30
Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 030402 (2011)
Physics
Quantum Physics
v2: Removed claim about most general NC-HV models, improved explanations
Scientific paper
A central question in our understanding of the physical world is how our knowledge of the whole relates to our knowledge of the individual parts. One aspect of this question is the following: to what extent does ignorance about a whole preclude knowledge of at least one of its parts? Relying purely on classical intuition, one would certainly be inclined to conjecture that a strong ignorance of the whole cannot come without significant ignorance of at least one of its parts. Indeed, we show that this reasoning holds in any non-contextual hidden variable model (NC-HV). Curiously, however, such a conjecture is \emph{false} in quantum theory: we provide an explicit example where a large ignorance about the whole can coexist with an almost perfect knowledge of each of its parts. More specifically, we provide a simple information-theoretic inequality satisfied in any NC-HV, but which can be \emph{arbitrarily} violated by quantum mechanics. Our inequality has interesting implications for quantum cryptography.
Vidick Thomas
Wehner Stephanie
No associations
LandOfFree
Does ignorance of the whole imply ignorance of the parts? - Large violations of non-contextuality in quantum theory does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Does ignorance of the whole imply ignorance of the parts? - Large violations of non-contextuality in quantum theory, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Does ignorance of the whole imply ignorance of the parts? - Large violations of non-contextuality in quantum theory will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-444593