Do All Spherical Viruses Have Icosahedral Symmetry?

Details Do All Spherical Viruses Have Icosahedral Symmetry? Do All Spherical Viruses Have Icosahedral Symmetry?

2009-02-20

arxiv.org/abs/0902.3566v2

Physics

Biological Physics

Scientific paper

Recent high resolution structures for viral capsids with 12, 32 and 72 subunits ($T1$, $T3$ and $T7$ viruses) have confirmed theoretical predictions of an icosadeltahedral structure with 12 subunits having five nearest neighbors (pentamers) and $(10T+2)-12$ subunits having six nearest neighbor subunits (hexamers). Here we note that theoretical considerations of energy strain for $T4$, $T9$ $T16$ and $T25$ viruses by aligned pentamers and energy strain along with the sheer number of possible arrangement of pentamers as the number of subunits grows, and simulations for such numbers of subunits make an icosadeltahedral configuration either miraculously unlikely or indicate that there must be a principle of capsid assembly of unprecedented fidelity in Nature. We predict, for example, that high resolution data will show $T4$ capsids to have $D_{5h}$ not icosahedral symmetry.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Do All Spherical Viruses Have Icosahedral Symmetry? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Do All Spherical Viruses Have Icosahedral Symmetry?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Do All Spherical Viruses Have Icosahedral Symmetry? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-671319