Differences Between the Response of the Equatorial TEC and foF2 to Solar Soft X-ray Irradiances

Details Differences Between the Response of the Equatorial TEC and foF2 to Solar Soft X-ray Irradiances Differences Between the Response of the Equatorial TEC and foF2 to Solar Soft X-ray Irradiances

Dec 2005

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2005agufmsa23a0305w&link_type=abstract

American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2005, abstract #SA23A-0305

Physics

2415 Equatorial Ionosphere, 2479 Solar Radiation And Cosmic Ray Effects

Scientific paper

Measurements of the solar soft X-ray irradiances from the SNOE satellite; the TEC from Ancon, Peru; and the foF2 from Jicamarca, Peru have been compared for a period of almost two years. While both TEC and foF2 have a significant response to changes in the solar irradiances, each responds differently. At noon time, solar irradiances have a stronger correlation with TEC than with foF2 and the solar irradiances lead TEC by ~1 day but they do not lead foF2. At earlier local times, the solar irradiances have a stronger correlation with foF2 than with TEC. The solar irradiances lead TEC by ~2 days and foF2 by ~1 day. The study shows that the ionospheric densities have a more significant dependence on solar soft X-ray irradiances than on F10.7.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Differences Between the Response of the Equatorial TEC and foF2 to Solar Soft X-ray Irradiances does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Differences Between the Response of the Equatorial TEC and foF2 to Solar Soft X-ray Irradiances, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Differences Between the Response of the Equatorial TEC and foF2 to Solar Soft X-ray Irradiances will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-752711