Deschanel's Physics

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

As regards the particular passage in my edition of Deschanel which I am challenged to defend by your Reviewer (NATURE, vol. iii. p. 343), his charge, which is somewhat obscured by rhetorical embellishment, seems to be that in the factor it has not been indicated that H and h, as well as 760, denote so many millimetres of mercury at zero. I think this was scarcely necessary, as the question whether the observed or reduced heights of the mercurial columns should be employed, is not one on which a doubt could occur to the mind of any intelligent reader, reduced heights being invariably employed in the chapter in which the passage occurs, and in the book generally.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Deschanel's Physics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Deschanel's Physics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Deschanel's Physics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-929588

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.