De-Quantising the Solution of Deutsch's Problem

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages

Scientific paper

Probably the simplest and most frequently used way to illustrate the power of quantum computing is to solve the so-called {\it Deutsch's problem}. Consider a Boolean function $f: \{0,1\} \to \{0,1\}$ and suppose that we have a (classical) black box to compute it. The problem asks whether $f$ is constant (that is, $f(0) = f(1)$) or balanced ($f(0) \not= f(1)$). Classically, to solve the problem seems to require the computation of $f(0)$ and $ f(1)$, and then the comparison of results. Is it possible to solve the problem with {\em only one} query on $f$? In a famous paper published in 1985, Deutsch posed the problem and obtained a ``quantum'' {\em partial affirmative answer}. In 1998 a complete, probability-one solution was presented by Cleve, Ekert, Macchiavello, and Mosca. Here we will show that the quantum solution can be {\it de-quantised} to a deterministic simpler solution which is as efficient as the quantum one. The use of ``superposition'', a key ingredient of quantum algorithm, is--in this specific case--classically available.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

De-Quantising the Solution of Deutsch's Problem does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with De-Quantising the Solution of Deutsch's Problem, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and De-Quantising the Solution of Deutsch's Problem will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-115024

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.