Physics
Scientific paper
Sep 2000
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2000georl..27.2973w&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 27, Issue 18, p. 2973-2976
Physics
1
Global Change: Climate Dynamics, Global Change: Instruments And Techniques, Meteorology And Atmospheric Dynamics: Climatology, Meteorology And Atmospheric Dynamics: Instruments And Techniques
Scientific paper
Criticisms leveled at the use of pattern correlation methods in climate-change detection studies are addressed. We first explain how spatial autocorrelation effects are accounted for. We then show why it is important to consider both pattern similarity and spatial-mean results in detection studies, and evaluate a mean-square-error statistic in this context. We also show that the use of changes in climate, as opposed to absolute climate states, does not lead to spurious trends in the pattern correlation statistic R(t). In doing this, we explain how previous pattern correlation studies account for ``time arrow'' effects in considering changes relative to an arbitrary reference year. We conclude that criticisms of the pattern correlation method are without substance.
Santer Benjamin D.
Taylor Karl E.
Wigley Tom M. L.
No associations
LandOfFree
Correlation approaches to detection does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Correlation approaches to detection, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Correlation approaches to detection will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1385834