Convergent calculations of double ionization of helium: from ($γ$,2e) to (e,3e) processes

Physics – Atomic Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 3 figures

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevA.69.050701

The first absolute (e,3e) measurements, by Lahmam-Bennani et al [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 59}, 3548 (1999)], have been recently approximately reproduced by Berakdar [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 4036 (2000)] and supported by Jones and Madison [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 07321 (2003)], but with widely differing conclusions. The former indirectly implied that the Born-CCC-based calculations of Kheifets et al [J. Phys. B {\bf 32}, 5047 (1999) were invalid due to the reliance on the 1st Born approximation. The latter argued that the 1st Born approximation was valid, but the wrong initial state was used. We investigate these claims and find that the original calculations of Kheifets et al are reproduced whether the 2nd Born approximation is incorporated or if we use a ground state similar to that of Jones and Madison, but appropriately corrected as done by Le Sech and co-workers [J. Phys. B {\bf 23}, L739 (1990)].

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Convergent calculations of double ionization of helium: from ($γ$,2e) to (e,3e) processes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Convergent calculations of double ionization of helium: from ($γ$,2e) to (e,3e) processes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Convergent calculations of double ionization of helium: from ($γ$,2e) to (e,3e) processes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-102704

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.