Controversy between Einstein and Bohr and two erroneous arguments used in supporting Copenhagen quantum mechanics

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 3 figures

Scientific paper

The support of Copenhagen quantum mechanics in the discussion concerning EPR experiments has been based fundamentally on two mistakes. First, quantum mechanics as well as hidden-variable theory give the same predictions; the statement of Belinfante from 1973 about the significant difference must be denoted as mistake. Secondly, the experimental violation of Bell's inequalities has been erroneously interpreted as excluding the hidden-variable alternative, while they have been based on assumption corresponding to classical physics. The EPR experiments cannot bring, therefore, any decision in the controversy between Einstein and Bohr. However, the view of Einstein is strongly supported by experimental results concerning the light transmission through three polarizers.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Controversy between Einstein and Bohr and two erroneous arguments used in supporting Copenhagen quantum mechanics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Controversy between Einstein and Bohr and two erroneous arguments used in supporting Copenhagen quantum mechanics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Controversy between Einstein and Bohr and two erroneous arguments used in supporting Copenhagen quantum mechanics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-491530

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.