Contrasting the UV and X-ray O VI Column Density Inferred for the Outflow in NGC 5548

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

16 pages, 1 figure, accepted for publication in ApJ

Scientific paper

10.1086/374920

We compare X-ray and UV spectroscopic observations of NGC 5548. Both data sets show O VI absorption troughs associated with the AGN outflow from this galaxy. We find that the robust lower limit on the column density of the O VI X-ray trough is seven times larger than the column density found in a study of the O VI UV troughs. This discrepancy suggests that column densities inferred for UV troughs of Seyfert outflows are often severely underestimated. We identify the physical limitations of the UV Gaussian modeling as the probable explanation of the O VI column density discrepancy. Specifically, Gaussian modeling cannot account for a velocity dependent covering fraction, and it is a poor representation for absorption associated with a dynamical outflow. Analysis techniques that use a single covering fraction value for each absorption component suffer from similar limitations. We conclude by suggesting ways to improve the UV analysis.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Contrasting the UV and X-ray O VI Column Density Inferred for the Outflow in NGC 5548 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Contrasting the UV and X-ray O VI Column Density Inferred for the Outflow in NGC 5548, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Contrasting the UV and X-ray O VI Column Density Inferred for the Outflow in NGC 5548 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-17872

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.