Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Jun 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007jgrb..11206415h&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 112, Issue B6, CiteID B06415
Physics
Geophysics
5
Tectonophysics: Tectonics And Magmatism, Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets: Heat Flow, Tectonophysics: Continental Cratons, Marine Geology And Geophysics: Gravity And Isostasy (1218, 1222), Tectonophysics: Continental Tectonics: General (0905)
Scientific paper
Continental elevations can be partitioned into contributions from thermal and compositional buoyancy and geodynamic forces. In order to isolate the thermal component, elevations of 36 North American tectonic provinces are adjusted for the effects of compositional thickness and density variations by computing an isostatic adjustment relative to a standard crustal section (2850 kg m-3 density and 39 km thickness). Crustal densities are estimated using an empirical velocity-density relationship. Compositional elevation adjustments applied to North American provinces range from ~-1100 m in the southern Rocky Mountains to 2300 m in the Gulf of California, with uncertainties ranging from ~200 m to >600 m. Theoretical thermal buoyancy is estimated by integrating the difference between a geotherm derived from observed values of heat flow and a reference geotherm. The best fitting continental heat flow-elevation model has a reference heat flow of 46.6 mW m-2 at 0 km and a 60:40 partitioning of surface heat flow between reduced and upper crustal radiogenic heat flow. Raw elevations of continental provinces show little correlation with heat flow, while compositionally adjusted elevations show a clear trend with ~3 km difference between hot and cold provinces. A continental heat flow-elevation plot is used to identify outliers in adjusted province elevations. Anomalous elevations may reflect a nonsteady state thermal regime, dynamically supported elevation, anomalous mantle, or some combination of these states. Discriminating between these elevation sources provides insight into the geodynamics of North America, demonstrating the usefulness of this approach in continental geodynamic studies.
Chapman David S.
Hasterok Derrick
No associations
LandOfFree
Continental thermal isostasy: 2. Application to North America does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Continental thermal isostasy: 2. Application to North America, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Continental thermal isostasy: 2. Application to North America will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-882935