Conference Discussion of the Nuclear Force

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Discussion at the 21st European Conference on Few Body Problems (EFP21) held at Salamanca, Spain, 30 Aug - 3 Sept 2010

Scientific paper

Discussion of the nuclear force, lead by a round table consisting of T. Cohen, E. Epelbaum, R. Machleidt, and F. Gross (chair). After an invited talk by Machleidt, published elsewhere in these proceedings, brief remarks are made by Epelbaum, Cohen, and Gross, followed by discussion from the floor moderated by the chair. The chair asked the round table and the participants to focus on the following issues: (i) What does each approach (chiral effective field theory, large Nc, and relativistic phenomenology) contribute to our knowledge of the nuclear force? Do we need them all? Is any one transcendent? (ii) How important for applications (few body, nuclear structure, EMC effect, for example) are precise fits to the NN data below 350 MeV? How precise do these fits have to be? (iii) Can we learn anything about nonperturbative QCD from these studies of the nuclear force? The discussion presented here is based on a video recording made at the conference and transcribed afterward.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Conference Discussion of the Nuclear Force does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Conference Discussion of the Nuclear Force, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Conference Discussion of the Nuclear Force will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-319153

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.