Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010agufmsa42a..09s&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #SA42A-09
Physics
[2439] Ionosphere / Ionospheric Irregularities
Scientific paper
Ionospheric radio occultation (RO) and in-situ measurements of plasma density fluctuations provide two different approaches for inferring the presence or absence of ionospheric scintillation. The RO technique involves a direct measure of scintillation at L-band frequencies, but in a limb-viewing geometry that entails some uncertainty regarding the precise geolocation of the associated irregularity region or regions. Scintillation over a range of frequencies from UHF to L-band can be inferred from observation of the in-situ irregularity spectrum together with a set of modeling assumptions. The CORISS (C/NOFS Occultation Receiver for Ionospheric Sensing and Specification) and PLP (Planar Langmuir Probe) instruments on board the C/NOFS satellite provide a means to compare and contrast the two approaches in a rigorous manner. This presentation with report initial comparison results based on data collected during the 2008-2010 time frame.
Bonito N.
Roddy Patrick A.
Straus Paul R.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparisons Between In-Situ Plasma Fluctuation and Radio Occultation Based Measures of Ionospheric Scintillation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparisons Between In-Situ Plasma Fluctuation and Radio Occultation Based Measures of Ionospheric Scintillation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparisons Between In-Situ Plasma Fluctuation and Radio Occultation Based Measures of Ionospheric Scintillation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1505422