Comparisons between EISCAT observations and model calculations of the high latitude ionosphere

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

7

Eiscat Radar System (Europe), Ionospheric Electron Density, Particle Precipitation, Polar Regions, Radar Tracking, Mathematical Models, Photoionization, Uk Satellites

Scientific paper

Calculations from a numerical model of the convection dominated high latitude ionosphere are compared with EISCAT data from October 24-25, 1984. The data are characterized by an unusually steady IMF with B(z) less than 0 and B(y) greater than 0. The general features of the velocity data were reproduced by the model, although the modeled velocity values in the afternoon sector were significantly less than those observed. Electron density calculations show good agreement with EISCAT observations near the F-peak, but did not agree near 211 km. In both cases, the greatest disagreement occurred early in the observations when the convection pattern was poorly known and showed evidence of long term temporal change.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparisons between EISCAT observations and model calculations of the high latitude ionosphere does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparisons between EISCAT observations and model calculations of the high latitude ionosphere, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparisons between EISCAT observations and model calculations of the high latitude ionosphere will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1758207

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.