Comparison of Statistical Multifragmentation Model simulations with Canonical Thermodynamical Model results: a few representative cases

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

10.1016/j.physletb.2008.09.012

The statistical multifragmentation model (SMM) has been widely used to explain experimental data of intermediate energy heavy ion collisions. A later entrant in the field is the canonical thermodynamic model (CTM) which is also being used to fit experimental data. The basic physics of both the models is the same, namely that fragments are produced according to their statistical weights in the available phase space. However, they are based on different statistical ensembles, and the methods of calculation are different: while the SMM uses Monte-Carlo simulations, the CTM solves recursion relations. In this paper we compare the predictions of the two models for a few representative cases.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparison of Statistical Multifragmentation Model simulations with Canonical Thermodynamical Model results: a few representative cases does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison of Statistical Multifragmentation Model simulations with Canonical Thermodynamical Model results: a few representative cases, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of Statistical Multifragmentation Model simulations with Canonical Thermodynamical Model results: a few representative cases will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-511531

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.