Comparison of Relativistic Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Revtex 13 pages, 5 figures, corrected some typos

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevC.62.054002

We investigate the difference between those relativistic models based on interpreting a realistic nucleon-nucleon interaction as a perturbation of the square of a relativistic mass operator and those models that use the method of Kamada and Gl\"ockle to construct an equivalent interaction to add to the relativistic mass operator. Although both models reproduce the phase shifts and binding energy of the corresponding non-relativistic model, they are not scattering equivalent. The example of elastic electron-deuteron scattering in the one-photon-exchange approximation is used to study the sensitivity of three-body observables to these choices. Our conclusion is that the differences in the predictions of the two models can be understood in terms of the different ways in which the relativistic and non-relativistic $S$-matrices are related. We argue that the mass squared method is consistent with conventional procedures used to fit the Lorentz-invariant cross section as a function of the laboratory energy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparison of Relativistic Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison of Relativistic Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of Relativistic Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-473403

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.