Comparing Dynamical and Photometric Mass Estimates of Low- and High-Redshift Galaxies: Random and Systematic Uncertainties

Details Comparing Dynamical and Photometric Mass Estimates of Low- and High-Redshift Galaxies: Random and Systematic Uncertainties Comparing Dynamical and Photometric Mass Estimates of Low- and High-Redshift Galaxies: Random and Systematic Uncertainties

2006-07-28

arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0607649v1

Astrophys.J.652:97-106,2006

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

Accepted for publication in ApJ (12 pages, 11 figures)

Scientific paper

10.1086/508128

We determine the importance of redshift-dependent systematic effects in the determination of stellar masses from broad band spectral energy distributions (SEDs), using high quality kinematic and photometric data of early-type galaxies at z~1 and z~0. We find that photometric masses of z~1 galaxies can be systematically different, by up to a factor of 2, from photometric masses of z~0 galaxies with the same dynamical mass. The magnitude of this bias depends on the choice of stellar population synthesis model and the rest-frame wavelength range used in the fits. The best result, i.e., without significant bias, is obtained when rest-frame optical SEDs are fitted with models from Bruzual&Charlot (2003). When the SEDs are extended to the rest-frame near-IR, a bias is introduced: photometric masses of the z~1 galaxies increase by a factor of 2 relative to the photometric masses of the z~0 galaxies. When we use the Maraston (2005) models, the photometric masses of the z~1 galaxies are low relative to the photometric masses of the z~0 galaxies by a factor of ~1.8. This offset occurs both for fits based on rest-frame optical SEDs, and fits based on rest-frame optical+near-IR SEDs. The results indicate that model uncertainties produce uncertainties as high as a factor of 2.5 in mass estimates from rest-frame near-IR photometry, independent of uncertainties due to unknown star formation histories.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comparing Dynamical and Photometric Mass Estimates of Low- and High-Redshift Galaxies: Random and Systematic Uncertainties does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparing Dynamical and Photometric Mass Estimates of Low- and High-Redshift Galaxies: Random and Systematic Uncertainties, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparing Dynamical and Photometric Mass Estimates of Low- and High-Redshift Galaxies: Random and Systematic Uncertainties will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-251714