Comparatives study of tri-diurnal anisotropy of cosmic ray intensity on different types of days during minimum solar activity period

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

1

Scientific paper

A comparative study of tri-diurnal anisotropy of Cosmic Ray intensity data has been performed for Deep River neutron monitoring station on geomagnetically 60 quietest days, 120 quiet days and all days during minimum solar activity period 1985-87. Histographic plots of percentage of occurrence of Phase (hrs) in a definate interval reveals that in all the three cases it is maximum in the interval of 2 to 4 hours direction for the year 1985, however, the value of peak relative to its neighbours is quite large in case of quietest days. Somehow, for the year 1987, the Phase is maximum in the interval of 5 to 7 hours direction. The peak sharpening is equally noticeable in case of amplitude histogrames as well. This bring out the fact that five most quietest days are better suited for study of daily variation on long term basis as well as short term basis.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparatives study of tri-diurnal anisotropy of cosmic ray intensity on different types of days during minimum solar activity period does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparatives study of tri-diurnal anisotropy of cosmic ray intensity on different types of days during minimum solar activity period, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparatives study of tri-diurnal anisotropy of cosmic ray intensity on different types of days during minimum solar activity period will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-799723

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.