Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Sep 1976
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1976geoj...46..535k&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Journal, vol. 46, no. 3, Sept. 1976, p. 535-553.
Physics
Geophysics
1
Earth Gravitation, Geophysics, Geopotential, Gravitational Fields, Planetary Gravitation, Graphs (Charts), Gravimetry, Gravity Anomalies, Satellite Observation, Spherical Harmonics, Statistical Analysis, Tables (Data)
Scientific paper
The paper compares and evaluates recent satellite-determined and combination models of the earth's gravitational field and attempts to select the one which best satisfies specific geophysical and orbital dynamical objectives. A statistical analysis of some of these models indicates that most gravity models are determined to a relative accuracy reflected by an rms of about 2 mgal of the differences between various models for the frequency range from n-2-7. Neither differences between various gravity models nor differences between purely satellite-determined geopotential models and their associated combination models show a consistent relationship with surface gravimetric coverage.
Khan Mohammed Aftab
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparative evaluation of recent global representations of earth's gravity field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparative evaluation of recent global representations of earth's gravity field, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparative evaluation of recent global representations of earth's gravity field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1415469