Comparative Analysis of Prominence Magnetic Field Measurements: Differences in Results Between Zeeman and Hanle Measurements

Details Comparative Analysis of Prominence Magnetic Field Measurements: Differences in Results Between Zeeman and Hanle Measurements Comparative Analysis of Prominence Magnetic Field Measurements: Differences in Results Between Zeeman and Hanle Measurements

Aug 1998

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1998soph..181..301b&link_type=abstract

Solar Physics, v. 181, Issue 2, p. 301-301 (1998).

Physics

1

Scientific paper

Results of magnetic field measurements in prominences using the Zeeman and Hanle methods are discussed critically. By considering an example of three prominences, for which magnetic field data from both methods are available, the discrepancies between the methods are demonstrated. The authors believe that the existing Hanle method does not reflect adequately the actual reality. To overcome the discrepancies calls for comparative analysis of prominence magnetic field measurements by both methods.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comparative Analysis of Prominence Magnetic Field Measurements: Differences in Results Between Zeeman and Hanle Measurements does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparative Analysis of Prominence Magnetic Field Measurements: Differences in Results Between Zeeman and Hanle Measurements, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparative Analysis of Prominence Magnetic Field Measurements: Differences in Results Between Zeeman and Hanle Measurements will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1538554