Comments Regarding "On the Nature of Science"

Physics – History and Philosophy of Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

An attempt to redefine science in the 21st century (BK Jennings, On the Nature of Science, Physics in Canada, 63(7) 2007) has abandoned traditional notions of natural law and objective reality, blurred the distinctions between natural science and natural history, elevated Occam's razor from an epistemological preference to a scientific principle, and elevated peer-review and experimental care as equals with repeatable experiment as arbiters of scientific validity. Our comments review the long-established axioms of the scientific method, remind readers of the distinctions between science and history, disprove the generality of Occam's razor by counter example, and highlight the risks of accepting additional scientific arbiters as equal to repeatable experiment.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comments Regarding "On the Nature of Science" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comments Regarding "On the Nature of Science", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comments Regarding "On the Nature of Science" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-448984

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.