Physics
Scientific paper
Sep 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009cqgra..26q8002h&link_type=abstract
Classical and Quantum Gravity, Volume 26, Issue 17, pp. 178002 (2009).
Physics
1
Scientific paper
In this brief reply, we elucidate some missing points in the comment (Khakshournia S 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 178001) on our original paper (Hoff da Silva J M and da Rocha R 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 055007), explicitly showing that the comment is unfounded in this context. We show that the term proposed equals zero, since the brane discontinuity is correctly defined in the torsion.
da Rocha R.
Hoff da Silva J. M.
No associations
LandOfFree
COMMENTS AND REPLIES: Reply to 'comment on 'Braneworld remarks in Riemann-Cartan manifolds'' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with COMMENTS AND REPLIES: Reply to 'comment on 'Braneworld remarks in Riemann-Cartan manifolds'', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and COMMENTS AND REPLIES: Reply to 'comment on 'Braneworld remarks in Riemann-Cartan manifolds'' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-838562