Comment on ``Torque or no torque? Simple charged particle motion observed in different inertial frames,'' by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 72 (12), 1484-1487 (2004)]

Details Comment on ``Torque or no torque? Simple charged particle motion observed in different inertial frames,'' by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 72 (12), 1484-1487 (2004)] Comment on ``Torque or no torque? Simple charged particle motion observed in different inertial frames,'' by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 72 (12), 1484-1487 (2004)]

2005-05-05

arxiv.org/abs/physics/0505038v1

Physics

General Physics

6 pages

Scientific paper

In this paper it is shown that the real cause of the apparent electrodynamic
paradox discussed by Jackson [J. D. Jackson, Am. J. Phys. 72, 1484 (2004)] is
the use of three-dimensional (3D) quantities E, B, F, L, N, .. . When 4D
geometric quantities are used then there is no paradox and the principle of
relativity is naturally satisfied.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comment on ``Torque or no torque? Simple charged particle motion observed in different inertial frames,'' by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 72 (12), 1484-1487 (2004)] does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on ``Torque or no torque? Simple charged particle motion observed in different inertial frames,'' by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 72 (12), 1484-1487 (2004)], we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on ``Torque or no torque? Simple charged particle motion observed in different inertial frames,'' by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 72 (12), 1484-1487 (2004)] will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-114276