Comment on "Remark on the renormalization group equation for the Penner model"

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.75.127901

We show explicitly that the sum over punctures for the three times derivative for the Penner free energy $F_{0}^{3}$, given by D.A. Johnston, Phys.Rev.D 51 (1995) is not correct. As a consequence, Eq.(21), the differentiated version for the renormalization group (RG) equation, is wrong. Also, his conclusion that the differentiated version of the (RG) equation for the three-times derivative of the free energy can be obtained from the higher genus (RG) equation can not be true. Finally, the differentiated version of the (RG) equation is extended to any $s$ derivative of the free energy $F_{0}$.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comment on "Remark on the renormalization group equation for the Penner model" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Remark on the renormalization group equation for the Penner model", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Remark on the renormalization group equation for the Penner model" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-116107

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.