Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory
Scientific paper
1998-12-08
Phys. Rev. Letters 81, 5253 (1998)
Physics
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Theory
5 pages, latex2e with a4wide.sty. This is an updated and extended version of the Comment published in Phys. Rev. Letters 81, 5
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5253
In this updated and expanded version of our delayed Comment we show that the np backward cross section, as presented by the Uppsala group, is seriously flawed (more than 25 sd.). The main reason is the incorrect normalization of the data. We show also that their extrapolation method, used to determine the charged piNN coupling constant, is a factor of about 10 less accurate than claimed by Ericson et al. The large extrapolation error makes the determination of the coupling constant by the Uppsala group totally uninteresting.
de Swart J. J.
Klomp R. A. M.
Rentmeester M. C. M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comment on piNN Coupling from High Precision np Charge Exchange at 162 MeV does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comment on piNN Coupling from High Precision np Charge Exchange at 162 MeV, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on piNN Coupling from High Precision np Charge Exchange at 162 MeV will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-468772