Comment on "Optical precursors in the singular and weak dispersion limits"

Details Comment on "Optical precursors in the singular and weak dispersion limits" Comment on "Optical precursors in the singular and weak dispersion limits"

2010-09-16

arxiv.org/abs/1009.3146v2

Journal of the Optical Society of America B 28, 3 (2011) 450

Physics

Optics

Scientific paper

We point out inconsistencies in the recent paper by Oughstun et al. on Sommerfeld and Brillouin precursors [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 1664-1670 (2010)]. Their study is essentially numerical and, for the parameters used in their simulations, the difference between the two limits considered is not as clear-cut as they state. The steep rise of the Brillouin precursor obtained in the singular limit and analyzed as a distinguishing feature of this limit simply results from an unsuitable time scale. In fact, the rise of the precursor is progressive and is perfectly described by a Airy function. In the weak dispersion limit, the equivalence relation, established at great length in Section 3 of the paper, appears as an immediate result in the retarded-time picture. Last but not least, we show that, contrary to the authors claim, the precursors are catastrophically affected by the rise-time of the incident optical field, even when the latter is considerably faster than the medium relaxation time.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comment on "Optical precursors in the singular and weak dispersion limits" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Optical precursors in the singular and weak dispersion limits", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Optical precursors in the singular and weak dispersion limits" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-27506