Comment on "On two misconceptions in current relativistic quantum information"

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages, added Journal reference (PRA reply to Phys. Rev. A 85, 016301 (2012) ) with the title "Reply to 'Comment on "Fermioni

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevA.85.016302

We show that, contrarily to the claims in [K. Bradler, (2011), arXiv:1108.5553] (and arXiv:1201.1045), the reference [Phys. Rev. A 83, 062323 (2011)] is devoid of flaws or mistakes. We show that the criticism comes from a misunderstanding of part of our work. We also discuss the claims made in arXiv:1108.5553 about entanglement measures as a valid tool in relativistic quantum information.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comment on "On two misconceptions in current relativistic quantum information" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "On two misconceptions in current relativistic quantum information", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "On two misconceptions in current relativistic quantum information" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-624629

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.