Comment on "Mass and Width of the Lowest Resonance in QCD"

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

2 pages, no figures

Scientific paper

I. Caprini's, G. Colangelo's, and H. Leutwyler's (CCL) article "Mass and Width of the Lowest Resonance in QCD", Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 132001 (2006) [hep-ph/0512364], is critically reviewed. The present comment is devoted to complement a recent experimental discussion (D.V. Bugg, J. Phys. G 34, 151 (2007) [hep-ph/0608081]) of short-comings in the CCL analysis, by presenting theoretical arguments pointing at a serious flaw in the theoretical formalism used by CCL, and also at the unlikeliness of their tiny error bars in the sigma-meson mass and width. The criticism made in the comment applies analogously to the analysis on the kappa-meson mass performed in the article "The K0*(800) scalar resonance from Roy-Steiner representations of pi K scattering" published as S. Descotes-Genon and B. Moussallam, Eur. Phys. J. C 48, 553 (2006) [hep-ph/0607133].

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comment on "Mass and Width of the Lowest Resonance in QCD" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Mass and Width of the Lowest Resonance in QCD", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Mass and Width of the Lowest Resonance in QCD" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-672740

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.