Comment on "Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements"

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

3 pages, RevTeX, 2 figures included, to appear on Phys. Rev. A (April 1998)

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3131

In the two papers [T. Kiss, U. Herzog, and U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2433 (1995); U. Herzog, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1245 (1996)] with titles similar to the one given above, the authors assert that in some cases it is possible to compensate a quantum efficiency $\eta\leq 1/2$ in quantum-state measurements, violating the lower bound 1/2 proved in a preceding paper [G. M. D'Ariano, U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Phys. Rev. A 52, R1801 (1995)]. Here we re-establish the bound as unsurpassable for homodyning any quantum state, and show how the proposed loss-compensation method would always fail in a real measurement outside the allowed $\eta >1/2$ region.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comment on "Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-619270

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.