Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 1998
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1998georl..25.4269m&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 25, Issue 23, p. 4269-4270
Physics
Seismology: Body Wave Propagation, Seismology: Earthquake Parameters
Scientific paper
In their recent article, Nolet et al. (1998) presented an analysis which led them to conclude that the epicentral distance and focal depth correction factors for mb which were previously published by Veith and Clawson (1972) are not accurate for events with focal depths greater than 100 km. In this brief commentary, we present some independent evidence which has led us to conclude that the Veith/Clawson (V/C) corrections are in fact quite accurate, at least for seismic events having focal depths of less than about 400 km.
McLaughlin Keith L.
Murphy Ronald J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comment on: ``Empirical determination of depth-distance corrections for mb and MW from Global Seismograph Network stations'' by Guust Nolet, Steve Krueger and Robert M. Clouser does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comment on: ``Empirical determination of depth-distance corrections for mb and MW from Global Seismograph Network stations'' by Guust Nolet, Steve Krueger and Robert M. Clouser, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on: ``Empirical determination of depth-distance corrections for mb and MW from Global Seismograph Network stations'' by Guust Nolet, Steve Krueger and Robert M. Clouser will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1292326