Comment on "Electromagnetic dissociation of ^8B and the astrophysical S-factor for ^7Be(p,gamma)^8B"

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Experiment

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

submitted to Phys. Rev. C

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevC.70.039801

Recently, Davids and Typel recommended a "low" value of S_{17}(0) based on fits to published direct and Coulomb dissociation data, in which they excluded the precise result of Junghans et al. We show that their statistical analysis is incorrect, due to a substantial underestimate of the experimental uncertainties, and leads to conclusions that are not supported by a proper analysis.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comment on "Electromagnetic dissociation of ^8B and the astrophysical S-factor for ^7Be(p,gamma)^8B" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Electromagnetic dissociation of ^8B and the astrophysical S-factor for ^7Be(p,gamma)^8B", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Electromagnetic dissociation of ^8B and the astrophysical S-factor for ^7Be(p,gamma)^8B" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-47474

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.