Comment on "Discrepancies in the resonance-fluorescence spectrum calculated with two methods"

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Comments on the comment are welcome

Scientific paper

There are two alternative methods used in literature to calculate the incoherent part of the spectrum of light scattered by an atomic system. In the first, one calculates the spectrum of the total light scattered by the system and obtains the incoherent part by subtracting the coherent part. In the second method, one introduces the fluctuation operators and obtains the incoherent part of the spectrum by taking the Fourier transform of the two time correlation function of the fluctuation operators. These two methods have been recognized for years as two completely equivalent for evaluating the incoherent part of the spectrum. In a recent paper Qing Xu et al. [Phys. Rev. A 78, 013407 (2008)] have shown that there are discrepancies between the incoherent parts of the stationary spectrum of a three-level Lambda-type system calculated with these two methods. The predicted discrepancies can be severe that over a wide rage of the Rabi frequencies and atomic decay rates, the spectrum calculated with the variance method can have negative values. This is obviously unphysical result since the fluorescence spectrum is a positively defined quantity. It represents the frequency distribution of light incoherently scattered by the atomic system. Therefore, the calculated spectrum should be positive for all frequencies independent of values of the Rabi frequencies and the damping rates. In this comment, we show that there are no discrepancies between these two methods. The equivalence of these two alternative methods leads to the same incoherent spectra that are positive for all frequencies independent of values of the parameters involved. The analytical analysis is supported by simple numerical calculations.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comment on "Discrepancies in the resonance-fluorescence spectrum calculated with two methods" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Discrepancies in the resonance-fluorescence spectrum calculated with two methods", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Discrepancies in the resonance-fluorescence spectrum calculated with two methods" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-281180

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.