Comment on "Bayesian Analysis of Pentaquark Signals from CLAS Data", with Response to the Reply by Ireland and Protopopsecu

Details Comment on "Bayesian Analysis of Pentaquark Signals from CLAS Data", with Response to the Reply by Ireland and Protopopsecu Comment on "Bayesian Analysis of Pentaquark Signals from CLAS Data", with Response to the Reply by Ireland and Protopopsecu

2008-07-08

arxiv.org/abs/0807.1330v2

Phys.Rev.Lett.101:029101,2008

Physics

High Energy Physics

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Section II is copied from Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 029101 (2008). In v2, my response to first italicized quote in Sec. III is chan

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.029101

The CLAS Collaboration has published an analysis using Bayesian model selection. My Comment criticizing their use of arbitrary prior probability density functions, and a Reply by D.G. Ireland and D. Protopopsecu, have now been published as well. This paper responds to the Reply and discusses the issues in more detail, with particular emphasis on the problems of priors in Bayesian model selection.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comment on "Bayesian Analysis of Pentaquark Signals from CLAS Data", with Response to the Reply by Ireland and Protopopsecu does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Bayesian Analysis of Pentaquark Signals from CLAS Data", with Response to the Reply by Ireland and Protopopsecu, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Bayesian Analysis of Pentaquark Signals from CLAS Data", with Response to the Reply by Ireland and Protopopsecu will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-686958